Monday, January 30, 2006

Transamerica Reviews

I was reading the Williamette Weekly last week (which is a local progressive rag) and ran into the following review of Transamerica. Here is the review and my response. Oh and there will be no show this week, I am taking a break as the last two shows were ALOT of work. In my next show I will examine reviews of this movie throughout the country to see how many of them are as bad as this one...

Monday, January 30
home | culture | Issue #32.11 | PREVIEW | 1/18/2006

Lost In Transition

Felicity Huffman's life-changing journey in Transamerica.

BY BYRON BECK & DAVID WALKER | bbeck at wweek.com

Transamerica
Felicity Huffman is not a man. It's important to keep that in mind while watching her in Transamerica, where she plays a pre-op transsexual man awaiting final gender reassignment so convincingly that you'll start to wonder what's under her skirt. But she is not a man. Felicity Huffman is just a damn good actress.

"There was a really short list of actresses I thought could play this," said Transamerica writer-director Duncan Tucker during a recent trip to Portland. "It was always going to be an actress, not a guy in a dress. I wanted to honor where the character was going and not mire her in what she left behind."

Huffman, in a performance that nabbed a Golden Globe Monday and will probably garner an Oscar nomination, stars in Tucker's wonderfully bittersweet film as Bree Osbourne, a person caught in a sexual limbo—not quite a complete woman, still partially a man—as he/she awaits the final surgical procedure needed to make the transformation complete. Just as Bree is about to undergo the final operation, he/she gets a call from Toby (Kevin Zegers), a teen boy looking for Stanley Osbourne. It turns out that before the hormone treatments started, Bree was Stanley. And during a "failed lesbian experiment" in college, Stanley fathered a child—the nearly 18-year-old Toby, now leading a troubled life as a hustler. Bree is reluctantly forced to deal with this unexpected surprise from her/his past, while keeping the truth from Toby.
advertisement

advertisement

"I joke that Transamerica is the Lord of the Rings of transsexual movies," says Tucker with a laugh. "Bree has to go on a journey to get rid of something she doesn't want, just as Frodo did. They are both in a way coming-of-age stories."

Bree's journey comes in the form of a cross-country road trip, where she/he and Toby gradually form a bond, and she/he wrestles with parental concerns and responsibility. Even relying on an age-old cinematic convention to convey personal growth and enlightenment, Tucker manages to keep Transamerica from degenerating into a jumbled mess of road-trip trappings. Instead, he infuses the film and his characters with quirky humanity that keeps them from becoming clichés and stereotypes—especially Bree, who is painted with finely detailed brushstrokes. In fact, it is the depth and complexity that Tucker and Huffman bring to Bree that give the film its heart and soul. Seldom are transgender characters treated with such cinematic respect that they're allowed to be more than comedic relief or a tragic subplot.

"I think the main thing that is subversive about this movie, if it is subversive at all, is the fact that the main character is a transsexual woman—but it's not a movie about transsexuality. It's like a sheep in wolf's clothing," explains Tucker. "It's a very sweet celebration of life."


Comments on "Lost In Transition"
| 1 comment(s)
Posted by "Rebecca Nay" | Thu, January 26
Lost In Transition

I am writing in response to Willamette Weekly's review of Transamerica. This review included a very important quote from director Duncan Tucker about casting lead character Bree Osbourne. "It was always going to be an actress, not a guy in a dress. I wanted to honor where the character was going and not mire her in what she left behind."

I find it REALLY ironic that Byron Beck and David Walker included this quote in their review because unlike Tucker, they refer to Bree as a "pre-op transsexual man" and use the term "he/she" through the entire article. While they praise the director for treating Bree with "cinematic respect", they fail to do that themselves. In a culture that turns a blind eye to the beating and murder of transgender people, I would expect a progressive publication like Willamette Weekly to treat this subject with more sensitivity. Being a transsexual WOMAN myself, I get sick and tired of the media blatantly disrespecting us. If gender has to be defined (which it shouldn't), then it should be determined by what's in between our ears, NOT our legs.

Rebecca Nay
Podcasting from Portland, Oregon
http://www.trannywreck.com

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Fantastic comment on that review Rebecca. Unfortuneately it always seems like no matter how much progress is made not everyone gets the memo. Overall though the review intrigued me enough to want to go see this movie.

12:05 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree with your comments, however, I disagree with this: "If gender has to be defined (which it shouldn't), then it should be determined by what's in between our ears, NOT our legs." I think if gender has to be defined it should be determined by heart and nothing else.

Btw, love ya Becky! ~"Turtle"

2:42 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home